Aws filemaker server Pc#
Aws filemaker server windows#

Aws filemaker server windows#

I’m not really familiar with windows and I set up an AWS system with FMS twice for testing Is it more or less locally (from Your office) or from anywhere in the world, accessed by many users, etc. It depends on how You want to use the server. And synchronous connections are seldom available outside of a data center. There are design methods to mitigate the WAN performance costs, but given a typical FMP solution running over a WAN, network speed and available bandwidth (two different parameters) is critical. The (ad-hoc, unscientific benchmark) moral: in WAN connections, network speed is paramount. Nothing else was installed on either server, outside of FMS. Server 1 - the older, slower machine, ran FM remotely, at about 3x the speed of the newer, far faster server. Installed the same FM database on both servers, and logging in from a remote machine (as to have minimal impact to the network I was on concurrently with Server2). It was connected to a 300 mBit down / 35 mBit up, asynchronous cable connection. Server 2 was a quad i7 Gen 7 machine with 32gb of RAM, and an NVMe/PCIe 512gb SSD (6 times the disk I/O speed of server 1), It was connected to a 100mBit up / 100mBit down, nearly unlimited bandwidth (lots of pipes), synchronous network connection. Server 1 was a quad i7 gen2 machine with 16gb of RAM and a SATA III 250gb SSD. *Additional hardware/software may be required, I don't read minds, best to talk it out with a sales rep or the computer consulting firm you deal with most regularly.Ran a benchmark test about 8 months ago, using 2 remote servers in 2 different locations, logged into a remote desktop at a 3rd location. PPTP is widely supported and probably sufficient if your users have good passwords (meaning it's required by the system and not up to their discretion). Otherwise a Windows server can do PPTP, L2TP, and SSTP VPNs. If your current router is capable of running VPN connections, look into using that. If you want people to access the data remotely then implement a VPN. I would not use web publishing to expose a database to the Internet, no matter how important or trivial the data is. That's still under $2,000 for a warrantied, supported, brand new, decent-performance, with tape backup & software* server. Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation is only $250. If you need a tape backup drive, add $800 for a DAT160. For instance an HP ML110 server, quad-core, 2GB RAM, 160GB Sofware RAID1, can be had for $900.

Aws filemaker server Pc#

If you go with PC hardware, get a server grade system from a vendor that provides a good warranty and support (HP, Dell, and many other providers).ĭon't be scared away by the term 'server grade hardware', this doesn't not automatically mean it's terribly expensive. I'd stick with a platform you're familiar with: OSX or Windows Server. I have a lot of very confidential, personal information in this database so I need to make sure only employees can access it.įilemaker publishes a list of recommended hardware configurations. What is the most cost efficient machine I can purchase to act as the server?Īlso, right now, only 4-6 users access it during a given day if it matters.

The most obvious method to accomplish this would be to connect a filemaker 11 server to one of my dedicated IPs and use web publishing to allow users to access the database. If I could cut out the part where employees need to return to the office to enter information, it would save me a lot of time and money. Employee returns to office and enters information into FM database.Employee goes to court house and looks up information about John Doe.Client sends request for background check on John Doe.The system is really outdated and slow, so it is definitely in need of an update. I currently have a database running on Filemaker 5 that deals with criminal background checks.